The Effectiveness of Supervision Programs on Improving Teaching Skills and Teacher Performance

Agustina Said

doi:10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i1.1956

Authors

Agustina Said Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i1.1956

Keywords:

Academic Supervision, Teaching Skills, Teacher Performance, Vocational Education, Teacher Professionalism

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the academic supervision program in improving teaching skills and teacher performance at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sangatta Utara. Using a quantitative approach and experimental design, the study involved 30 teachers as respondents, where 60% had less than 5 years of teaching experience, and 40% had more than 5 years of experience. Data were collected through standardized observation instruments and analyzed using t-test and regression analysis. The results showed a significant increase in teachers' teaching skills by 23.08% (from a score of 65 to 80) and teacher performance by 21.43% (from a score of 70 to 85) after the implementation of the supervision program. The statistical analysis produced a t-value of 5.67 with a p-value <0.05 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.62, indicating that 62% of the variation in teacher performance can be explained by the supervision program. The majority of teachers expressed high satisfaction with the supervision program in providing an understanding of learning objectives (85%), improving teaching skills (90%), providing constructive feedback (88%), encouraging creativity (87%), and increasing collaboration between teachers (80%). Factors supporting the effectiveness of supervision include the frequency of periodic supervision, collaborative supervision methods, school management support, and teacher self-reflection. This study has important implications for the development of an adaptive supervision model for vocational education and can be an empirical reference for similar educational institutions in designing effective and sustainable teacher professionalism improvement programs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akça, F. (2019). Sustainable Development in Teacher Education in Terms of Being Solution Oriented and Self-Efficacy. Sustainability, 11(23), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236878

Albashiry, N. (2015). Professionalization of curriculum design practices in technical vocational colleges: Curriculum leadership and collaboration. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036539401

Callahan, J. L., & Watkins Jr., C. E. (2018). The science of training III: Supervision, competency, and internship training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(4), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000208

DiPaola, M., & Wagner, C. A. (2018). Improving instruction through supervision, evaluation, and professional development. IAP.

Ghavifekr, S., & Ramzy, M. I. (2020, September 1). Exploring Effective Leadership Practices of Private School Principals to Improve Teachers’ Academic Excellence and Students’ Learning Achievement. | EBSCOhost. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202009_65(3).0005

Goe, L., Holdheide, L., & Miller, T. (2011). A Practical Guide to Designing Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation Systems: A Tool to Assist in the Development of Teacher Evaluation Systems. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520828

Goodnough, K. (2011). Examining the long?term impact of collaborative action research on teacher identity and practice: The perceptions of K–12 teachers. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.547694

Hasan, M. S., & Aziz, A. (2023). Kontribusi Pendidikan Islam dalam Pengembangan Sosial Emosional Peserta Didik di MTs Salafiyah Syafiiyah Tebuireng Jombang. Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.54437/irsyaduna.v3i2.1124

Johnston, O., & Wildy, H. (2016). The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students – A review of the international literature. Australian Journal of Education, 60(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115626522

Kamali, A. N., & Sugiyanto, S. (2024). Strategi Guru Mata Pelajaran Fiqh Dalam Peningkatkan Pemahaman Agama. Ngaos: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.59373/ngaos.v2i2.63

Kanya, N., Fathoni, A. B., & Ramdani, Z. (2021). Factors Affecting Teacher Performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1462–1468. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1328059

Katel, K. P. (2023). Teachers’ Motivational Factors and Student Learning Achievements. Solukhumbu Multiple Campus Research Journal, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3126/smcrj.v5i1.64887

Khasanah, A. I. (2024). The Role of Non-Directive Supervision in Teacher Career Development and Educational Professionalism. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15642/japi.2024.6.1.66-74

Kiilu, S. N., Rugar, T. O., Benson, J., Ngei, P. M., Hinneh, M., & Chemitei, K. (2023). Strategies for enhancing instructional supervision to improve education quality in public secondary schools: A case study of Makueni County, Kenya. African Journal of Education, Science and Technology, 7(3), Article 3. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajedscitech/article/view/254683

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

Mette, I. M., Aguilar, I., & Wieczorek, D. (2020). A Thirty State Analysis of Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Systems in the ESSA Era. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/jes/vol3/iss2/7

Mulyasa, H. E. (2021). Menjadi guru penggerak merdeka belajar. Bumi Aksara.

Prasetyo, B. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Perpustakaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian (STIK); Raja Grafindo Persada. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id

Priadana, M. S., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Pascal Books.

Price, H. E. (2012). Principal–Teacher Interactions: How Affective Relationships Shape Principal and Teacher Attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 39–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11417126

Subagio, A., Waruwu, M., Enawaty, E., & Halida, H. (2024). Collaborative Academic Supervision as an Effort to Optimize Teacher Performance in the Independent Curriculum. Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities, 7(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v7i4.41505

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.

Suriagiri, S., Akrim, A., & Norhapizah, N. (2022). The Influence of School Principal Supervision, Motivation, and Work Satisfaction on Teachers’ Performance. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(7), 2523–2537. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1350270

Wajdi, F., Seplyana, D., Juliastuti, J., Rumahlewang, E., Fatchiatuzahro, F., Halisa, N. N., Rusmalinda, S., Kristiana, R., Niam, M. F., Purwanti, E. W., Melinasari, S., & Kusumaningrum, R. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Cv Widina Media Utama. https://repository.penerbitwidina.com/publications/567818/