Determination Of The Amount Of Dowry At Lampung Traditional Marriage In A Review Of Fiqh Munakahat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i3.2633Keywords:
dowry, Lampung Melinting custom, Islamic family law, empirical juridical research, marriage traditionAbstract
This article examines the determination of relatively high dowries (mahar/maskawin) in Lampung Melinting traditional marriages in East Lampung and their conformity with Islamic law and Indonesian marriage law. Using an empirical juridical approach, data were collected through interviews with traditional leaders, religious leaders, community figures, and married couples, supported by statutory and conceptual materials. The findings show that the amount and form of dowry are not fixed, but are negotiated through family deliberation, taking into account the groom’s economic capacity and the expectations of the bride’s family within local custom. A high dowry is perceived as a symbol of pride, social status, and the groom’s seriousness in building a household, but it may also trigger social pressure, land sales, and economic burden. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, there is no minimum or maximum standard of dowry as long as it is lawful, valuable, and agreed upon willingly. The study concludes that the Lampung Melinting practice of determining dowry reflects a dynamic interplay between religious norms, state law, and living custom, which needs continuous contextualization in modern society and justice.
Downloads
References
Adistyan, M. (2024). The urgency of Qur'an education for adolescents in the digital era. Al-Urwatul Wutsqa, 4(2).
Ashari, H. (2024). Reconstruction of considerations of very urgent reasons in the case of marriage dispensation in the religious court. Al Qalam: Scientific Journal of Religion and Society, 18(2), 1087. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i2.3389
Assagaf, M. (2023). Judge's consideration in the marriage dispensation case in the Tutuyan Religious Court. Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.30984/ajifl.v3i1.2540
Baihaqi, A. (2021). The rights of wives in taklik talak reviewed from the perspective of Islamic law. Khuluqiyya: Journal of Legal Studies and Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v3i2.66
Baihaqi, N. N. (2023). Interpretation of marriage verses in the Qur'an. Ibn Abbas, 5(2), 240. https://doi.org/10.51900/ias.v5i2.19771
Fitri, W., Tampubolon, T., Santoso, I. R., Aprilia, V., Adiyanto, A., & Ramadani, N. A. (2023). Juridical study of the implications of talaq divorce. HAKAM, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v7i2.6160
Hadiyanto, I. P. (2024). Legal protection in divorce cases and joint property lawsuits. Pulpit Integrity, 3(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.36841/mimbarintegritas.v3i1.4017
Hudayah, N. (2023). Comparison of judges' decisions in determining the application for itsbat nikah. USRAH, 3(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v3i2.489
Ishaq, H. (2017). Legal research methods. Alfabetta.
Jaya, F., Fitri, W., & Ulya, M. (2024). Implementation of marriage dispensation at Batam City Religious Court. BOAT Journal of Legal Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.51826/perahu.v12i1.942
Khrisnanda, F., & Shanti, T. I. (2022). Psychological distress and dyadic coping in marital satisfaction of SAR rescuers. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 37(2), 307–362. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v37i2.4887
Mohfalatehan, Akbar, M., & Malarangan, H. (2024). Analysis of the judge's decision on polygamy license in the perspective of Maqasid al-Sharia. International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law and Society, 6(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.vol6.iss1.89
Nafia'h, Z. (2022). The role of the weton tradition reviewed from Islamic law. Journal of Religious and Social Studies, 18(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v18i1.4224
Nazareth, M. (2023). Child marriage dispensation reviewed from Law No 16 of 2019. Bandung Conference Series Law Studies, 3(2), 1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i2.7298
Puspitadewi, T. R. (2022). Socialization of adolescent counseling information program in preventing early marriage. Journal of Health Community Service, 8(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.33023/jpm.v8i1.918
Rahma, S. F. M. (2023). Analysis of early marriage on children's rights. Echoes of Justice, 10(3), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2023.20386
Rinwanto, R., Aditama, P. J., Supriyadi, I., & Nurcholis, M. (2024). Calculation of weton as an effort to realize sakinah family. Minhaj Journal of Sharia Science, 5(2), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.52431/minhaj.v5i2.3003
Subari, Subari, & Sukarddin, S. (2022). Kaboro Co'i solidarity in the marriage of the Donggo Tribe. JIM Student Scientific Journal, 7(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v7i2.20989
Supratama, R. (2024). The value of Islamic education in the Awiq-Awiq Pisuke tradition. At Turots Journal of Islamic Education, 270–281. https://doi.org/10.51468/jpi.v6i1.471
Syandri, S., & Zulfikar, Z. (2022). Services as marriage dowry in the four schools. Bustanul Fuqaha Journal of Islamic Law, 3(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v3i1.519
Wijaya, E. P., Yuhastina, Y., & Nurhadi, N. (2022). Cultural crisis in marriage procedures during Covid-19. Sociohumanities, 8(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.30738/sosio.v8i2.12572
Yanti, E., & Suroto, S. (2024). Implementation of the online court product queue system. Journal of Pustaka Mitra, 4(4), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.55382/jurnalpustakamitra.v4i4.739
Yuliana, Y., Ramli, R., & Mansur, R. (2023). The role of Attaralu in the marriage system. Syntax Literate, 8(5), 3338–3345. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11260
Yulinda, D. (2023). Judge consideration in the dispensation of minors' marriage. Fundamentals Scientific Journal of Law, 12(2), 506–526. https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v12i2.173
Zainuri, M. (2024). The perspective of Islamic family law. El-Izdiwaj, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24042/el-izdiwaj.v4i2.19335
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jamzuri Malik MD, Syamsu Madyan, Dzulfikar Rodafi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






