This is an outdated version published on 2025-02-21. Read the most recent version.

SIGNIFICANCE OF TEACHER COMPETENCE TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT AT MTS AL-KHAIRIYAH BADAMUSALAM SERANG CITY

Authors

Safuroh Safuroh ROHIDIN
Ade Faqih Kurniawan Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Nanang Faturachman Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Wasehudin Wasehudin Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Fandy Adpen Lazzvietamsi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
Nurul Indana STIT Al Urwatul Wutsqo Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54437/ilmuna.v7i1.1623

Keywords:

Kompetensi, Guru, Implementasi, Asesmen Autentik, Competency, Teacher, Implementation, Authentic Assessment.

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze teachers' competencies in conducting authentic assessments in the affective (attitude), cognitive (knowledge), and psychomotor (skills) domains. This aligns with Law Number 14 of 2005, Article 10, Paragraph 1 concerning Teachers and Lecturers, which stipulates that teachers must possess various competencies to carry out their teaching and educational duties professionally, ensuring that academic goals are effectively achieved. The method used in this study is a quantitative field survey analyzed using statistical methods. The population and sample in this study consist of 17 educators, specifically all educators at MTs Al-Khairiyah Badamusalam, Serang City, using a saturated sampling technique. The results show that the competence of MTs Al-Khairiyah Badamusalam teachers in conducting authentic assessments in the affective domain scored 70.58%, within the range of 61% to 80% (good). The teachers' ability to conduct authentic assessments in the cognitive domain reached 94.11%, within the range of 81% to 100% (very good). Their ability to conduct authentic assessments in the psychomotor domain achieved a score of 83.19%, within the range of 81% to 100% (very good). Through the implementation of authentic assessments in the learning process, it is hoped that the educational objectives at the educational unit level can be realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Majd. Penilaian Autentik Proses dan Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

Abdul Majid. Penilaian Autentik Proses dan Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Interes. 2014.

Achmad, Syaefudin. “Model Pembelajaran Otentik Dalam Mata Pelajaran Pai.” Journal of Research and Thought on Islamic Education (JRTIE) 2, no. 2 (2019): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.24260/jrtie.v2i2.1415.

Admin. “Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Doden.” Universitas Sumatra Utara. https://jdh.usu.ac.id, 2023.

Andriyani Dea Wulandari. “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran IPA Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Pendidikan sains 6 (2018): 35.

Budiarti Gahara. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajarn Pendidikan Agama Islam Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan 1 (2018): 95.

Cholifah Tur Rosidah et. al. “Analisis Kesiapan Guru Mengimplementasikan Asesmen Autentik Dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 12, no. 01 (2021): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpd.v12i01.21159.

Dinda Dwi Magfiroh, Sukarno, & Desy Eka Citra Dewi. “Problematika Implemetasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum dalam Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti di SD Negeri 01 Kepahiang.” Islamc Education Journal 3, no. 1 (2022): 35.

Dwi, Dani, dan Nur Hidayat. “Urgensi penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Tingkat Sekolah Dasar” 3, no. 2 (2022): 23–30.

Fadhilah Millah. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik dalam Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Kajian Tekhnologi Pendidikan 4 (2021): 44.

Ismet Basuki. Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Kunandar. Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik berdasarkan Kurikulum

Marfuah, Anis. “Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran PAI di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi.” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar 3 (2019): 38.

Nabilah, I Nyoman, Husniati. “Indikasi Kesulitan Guru dalam melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013 di SDN 50 Cakranegara.” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan 6 (2021): 618.

Nurhayati. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Sejarah di SMAN 1 Semarang.” Jurnal Pendidikan 6 (2018): 21–30.

Rani Putri Prihati. “Learning Assesment Model of Islamic Religious Education.” Jurnal Rumah Indonesia 2 (2022): 382.

Ronald Hasibuan. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 1 (2021): 27.

Samsudin, Mohamad Aso, Ukhtul Iffah, Fakultas Tarbiyah Universitas, Fakultas Tarbiyah Universitas, dan Definisi Penilaian Autentik. “Penilaian Autentik pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” Jurnal Study Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam 4, no. 1 (2019): 79.

Sugiri, Wiku Aji, dan Sigit Priatmoko. “Persprektif Asesmen Autentik Sebagai Alat Evaluasi Dalam Merdeka Belajar.” At-Thullab?: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah 4, no. 1 (2020): 53. https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v4i1.119.

Supriadi, Gito. “Kompetensi Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik di Madrasah Aliyah Negri (MAN) Pulang Pisau Kabupaten Pulang Pisau Kalimantan Tengah.” Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan 12 (2021): 12–19.

Umami, Muzlikhatun. “Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Kependidikan 6, no. 2 (2018): 222–32. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

Versions

How to Cite

Safuroh, S., Faqih Kurniawan , A. ., Faturachman , N. ., Wasehudin , W. ., Adpen Lazzvietamsi, F. ., & Indana, N. . (2025). SIGNIFICANCE OF TEACHER COMPETENCE TOWARDS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT AT MTS AL-KHAIRIYAH BADAMUSALAM SERANG CITY. Ilmuna: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 6(2), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.54437/ilmuna.v7i1.1623